A month doesn’t pass without the administration issuing another exemption from a mandate previously held out as nonnegotiable… Why not exempt employers for issues of conscience?

If a corporation can have an “imputed racial identity” based on the race of its owners, it can have “imputed religious identity” based on the religion of its owners.

The government cannot force families to abandon their faith just to earn a living.

The conscience clause that the Green and Hahn families rely upon is consistent with scores of federal and state laws dating back more than 40 years.

As a nation, we should insist that our laws should encourage and support, not penalize, citizens who seek to consistently adhere to their moral convictions.

When individuals or groups are denied participation, or equal participation, in the political process, the laws are apt to become oppressive as to them. This poses a serious danger for religious liberty.

The government burdens the businesses exercise of religion by forcing them to either renounce their religious beliefs or pay hundreds of millions of dollars in fines each year.

The law does not ask courts to pretend that corporations are robots because corporations are owned and operated by people.

RFRA says, for all of us, that religious freedom matters, that it matters to policy winners and losers alike, and that if we can accommodate religious believers’ practices and objections, then we should.

The best of our legal heritage favors recognition of religious freedom exercised by family-run businesses and closely held companies.