V Menu Skip to content
  • The Case
    • The Decision
    • Case Timeline
  • About Hobby Lobby
  • FAQ
  • News

Month: February 2014

In a Battle of Semantics, the Family Businesses Win with Scientific Facts

Posted on February 27, 2014

No matter how the government spins the issues and tries to frame the semantics, the science, history, and tradition are on the side of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga.

Leave a comment

Challenge to Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Mandate Could Save Nation from Dangerous Path

Posted on February 27, 2014

Does running a business mean you have to silence your conscience? Next month, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that will decide that question.

Leave a comment

High Court Should Nix Contraception Order

Posted on February 27, 2014

The First Amendment’s language on freedom of religion could not be more clear: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

Leave a comment

Mandates Make Martyrs Out of Corporate Owners

Posted on February 27, 2014

The government can’t force individuals to forfeit their free exercise rights when they incorporate a business…

Leave a comment

Why is RFRA Still Valid Against the Federal Government?

Posted on February 27, 2014February 27, 2014

Does the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) entitle a for-profit corporation to an exemption from the requirement of providing employees with health coverage that includes contraception, on the ground that the owners of the corporation have religious objections to providing such coverage?

Leave a comment

Congress Answered This Question: Corporations are Covered

Posted on February 20, 2014February 26, 2014

The threshold issue in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores is whether any plaintiff’s free exercise of religion is substantially burdened within the meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Leave a comment

Obama’s War on the First Amendment

Posted on February 18, 2014February 26, 2014

Hobby Lobby has courageously stood up for its religious principles against this requirement despite the threat of fines of $1.3 million daily for not complying with this Obamacare mandate.

Leave a comment

Hobby Lobby Files Supreme-Court Brief Challenging DOJ Arguments

Posted on February 18, 2014March 24, 2014

The Green family’s lawyers argue that the owners of the craft store chain “exercise their faith through Hobby Lobby, and those beliefs are entitled to protection.”

Leave a comment

STRANGE: Defending Faith from Federal Bullies

Posted on February 17, 2014February 26, 2014

As Attorney General of Alabama, I am proud to see our state, along with 20 other states, stand shoulder to shoulder with the Becket Fund in opposing the Department of Health and Human Services mandate.

Leave a comment

Jindal Warns of ‘Silent War’ on Religion in Reagan Library Speech

Posted on February 14, 2014February 26, 2014

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal blasted the “silent war” that he said is undermining the nation’s basic principles in a major speech Thursday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

Leave a comment

Posts navigation

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Answers to All Your Hobby Lobby Questions
  • Supreme Court rejects contraceptives mandate for some corporations
  • Supreme Court ruling affirms Hobby Lobby victory
  • Supreme Court rules in favor of Hobby Lobby in birth-control mandate case
  • Supreme Court rules against Obama in contraception case

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    • About The Becket Fund
    • Media

    Stand with Hobby Lobby, and let your voice be heard. Upload a photo of yourself (minimum 1 MB) and a brief statement of support (35 words or less) to join a powerful force of supporters behind preserving religious freedom.

    • Accepted file types: jpg, jpeg, png, gif.
    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.