How straightforward statutory interpretation affects the Hobby Lobby case

We know that the parade of horribles trotted out by the government to deny Hobby Lobby’s RFRA rights includes exactly the ones relied on by the Court in Employment Division v. Smith. By enacting RFRA, Congress plainly regarded the parade of horribles as imaginary. So we know that, as a matter of simple statutory interpretation, RFRA’s reach shouldn’t be stunted by the government’s Chicken Little act.

Leave a Reply

Stand with Hobby Lobby, and let your voice be heard. Upload a photo of yourself (minimum 1 MB) and a brief statement of support (35 words or less) to join a powerful force of supporters behind preserving religious freedom.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.